Social equality

These are my most prized writings. I hope you enjoy.

Similarities in Female Gender Roles Among Consumerist Based Societies and Pastoralist Cultures in Kenya

 

 

Introduction

The parity of female and male ascribed statuses have historically risen and fallen according to the culture and social climate in which they exist. This is to say the ebb and flow of equality among men and women often depend on the chosen mode of living the questioned culture utilizes. Modernization and a globalizing economy have created awareness for the continuing parity of both male and female sexes. The peoples of Rural Kenya and North America are superficially as diverse from one another in many aspects of social equality but utilize the same framework to subjugate the female gender in times of environmental stressors or political lobbying. This correlation between the sexes and equality in the public and domestic spheres has a major dependency to be based on the production of wealth, food supply, or subsequent lack thereof. A comparison of these two cultures that practice gender stratification have  revealed a close link to the production or amassing of basic needs with the practice of  relaxing or enforcing of patriarchal domination. I am going to present an abbreviated history of how female gender roles are not fixed but fluctuate among their cultures based largely on environmental conditions and availability of sustainment sources even in contemporary times. Through my research I hope to prove the moderate elasticity and varying nature of hierarchical differentiation, achieved and ascribed statuses within these two distinct cultures. I will evaluate its maladaptive consequences to the psyche of the female gender as well as the adaptive implications it offers in emerging society.

Background

The notion of differentiation between the sexes has been a staple in the lineage of humanity possibly since its very inception. Presumably humans sought to divide work details amongst the men and women in ways which suited them both physically and offered some limited protection from the dangers of the world in which they lived. These actions where as much a protective measure to secure the safety and lineage of future generations via the female reproductive ability as well as place a value or status on the female sex. Within all the iterations of societal constructs we have explored in our collective existence, there has been a marked divide between the roles of woman as compared to those of men. In the interests of this paper we will narrow our view of civilization and restrict it only to those of the Masai, a rural people of Kenya who live in Western Africa, and their cultural counterpoint, the American peoples of North America. Female ascribed statuses have often covered various and extreme forms. They can be a matrilocal existence in which the focus of all economic and social activities centers on a matriarchal figure that controls the norms and laws of their community.

And across the spectrum, the other extreme is a patrilocal society where women of eligible can be essentially purchased through a bride wealth and become the property of the new husband or husband’s family as though the wife is a commodity similar to currency or prestige.(Kottak 2000:464-465)

The Masai of Kenya are a society of nomadic pastoralists that roam the open savanna and grasslands of Eastern Africa. Their culture is deeply embedded in the lands and ranges which they graze their cattle. This semi arid and often dangerous environment can be harsh and unforgiving at times which has caused the Masai to adopt a strongly patriarchal structured society that values regimentation and traditions that reign from generations prior. It is under these environmental conditions the Masai have developed their ability as expert herders of cattle and small livestock as the sole means of survival. The daily routine in tribe life is compartmentalized and rigidly constructed. The men assume the roles of both herdsmen and warriors for their people. These roles, which are presented to the men while in their respective age groups (women also undergo their own unique age defined strata as well) are what is key to understanding the domestic-public dichotomy. These practices clearly define social divisions or gender stereotypes and are what have become ingrained in the traditional framework of the tribe’s history.  To gain more comprehension, an explanation of the general social rites of passage would be beneficial.

Masai men are born into and age grade that exists in a continual four year period. The grade is uniquely named and this group will progress through various social functions (young herdsman, circumcision, warrior grade, married family men, and finally village elders) together. This collective liminality creates solidarity for the group and lasts their entire lives. These groups largely only interact with each other and can suffer social consequences for any unsanctioned interactions with younger age grades. The women do not pass through a recognized graded rite as do the males but they do receive a social ranking based on their function in society (age based) that closely resembles that of their male contemporaries. The women negotiate their social journeys from the beginnings as “young girls who aid in domestic responsibilities (endito)with their mothers , to older young girls whose responsibilities are to be the girlfriends (intoyie) of the warrior grade males” and live with them in their emanyata or “warrior village.”(Hodgson 1999:44-45) After this stage the women then become circumcised and are then eligible to marry (they also then live in the enkang or “family village”), bear children and ultimately attain their final social category (koko) which is similar to a “grandmother” who cares and directs the youth through their responsibilities. The different “social gradients are all met with various rituals and linguistic differentiations among the women” (Hodgson 1999:48).

Historically, Masai men are polygamous, which is they can marry as many women as they can rightfully support or take care of (Burton, Kirk 1979:845-846). The women present in these situations are then placed into a hierarchy of prominence. The first wife is the head boss of all the other wives in the “home place” or Boma and as such enjoys the most autonomy. Her son has first priority to the inheritance of the auxiliary livestock (similar to the amount paid in bride wealth) and status of the husband. She is also entitled to trade or sell any overage or surplus of milk or hides that she or the other wives produce. These women also have a stake in the sales, slaughter, and trading decisions that are proposed by the male head of household.  A focal responsibility of this wife is to ensure the “background” duties of daily life are completed by the other wives. These duties range from the obvious child rearing, cleaning, and cooking, to as far as hunting small game, trading for provisions from other tribes or caravan routes to major trading posts and even the construction of the homes in which their families reside in. The Masai woman’s caring of the house small stock and cattle are crucial to the dietary and economic survival of the tribe. They are also responsible for the social networking of  their society. These interconnections with outside entities ensure a means of survival and add another dimension to the economy of the tribe. These actions are centrally imperative to the overall survival and maintenance of the tribe.

Masai men generally perceive these duties of the women beneath their social level as men and will not interfere or concern themselves in their undertaking (Hodgson 1999:48). In this system Women are granted an area of control among the society but never a commanding or undeniable position that cannot be rescinded. In fact, the Masai women, when they are of eligible age, often become a commodity in that they can be traded for and sent away as payment or tribute to further the social or monetary goals of their family. These women bring a bride wealth or progeny price when they are married off which is usually paid in the common form of currency in the Masai culture, cattle. These women do not choose their husbands nor do they enjoy any recourse for their betrothement. They are allowed to divorce only under specific circumstances but the wedding payment must be returned causing a situation that can be too costly for parties to resolve and often results in a consented separation or a rearrangement of living space terms. The cultural indoctrination during the formative years of life prescribes the submissive behavior as exampled in this text in regards to the social standing of the female Masai. The domestic-public dichotomy is further widened by trained examples of desired behavior of the male component which is enforced by social mores.  The ascribed status of these female tribeswomen is seen as inescapable or unavoidable and causes a cyclic function of repetition.

Contemporary American life as it is known today is the culmination of a historically brief and variegated background. As a nation in a global neighborhood, the United States does not have a cultural depth or uni-linear history as that of the much older Masai. But even in this apparent superficial aberration there exists an essence of coincidence that can, given the proper conditions, mirror the African culture and then be the proper basis or platform to evaluate and explore the similarities that are present.

Since America’s departure from colonial rule, this society has travelled along an ever evolving track attempting to value the rights and privileges of the citizens and develop a cultural equality in that there are no overt social restrictions on free will. Under these stipulations citizens can exercise a number of personal choices. Women, for example, are free to choose their own professions, attend higher educational facilities, own, sell, trade property as they see fit. On a statutory level, women’s rights are equal to the rights of men. This development was not always the norm. Women’s rights have only recently evolved during a time when men were mostly engaged in warfare and not present to tend the growing industrial sector and the need for skilled/ unskilled labor was suited to the hiring of female workers (Kottak 2008:467).

From then the country has since recognized the efforts of women and made allowances to promote equality in the judicial forum. This “punctuated equilibrium”  from not having a great social presence to suddenly attaining gender parity through the visage of the law has not been fully reconciled against the traditional male views on gender stereotyping that persisted since before the acceptance of female rights. Traditional American ideology dictates the men as being the greater financial earners and providers for the more submissive female and their family. This basic tradition has been the bedrock for a view of what can loosely be described as a pseudo patriarchal society that is blended or masked with an overdeveloped sense of European chivalry. In basic terms, the American way of life does not function as closely to the level of real survival in terms of the comparative lifestyle of the Masai. There is not such an acute sense of mortal danger from death or starvation in North America due to a network of services or wildly varying specialties that offer the basic and advanced human necessities such as child care, homes, vehicles, food gathering, education, medicine; that are not as easily attained by their African contemporaries. Seemingly, the American culture has more opportunity to focus less on hunting / gathering or pastoral herding and focus more on the competitive aspect of attempting to amass more of these goods and services to impress the status of the individual. Both men and women partake into this “prestige cycle” at some point during their lives and find ways to compare or rate themselves against their compatriots.

This self appraisal is a normal interaction within the society due largely to the aforementioned enculturation effort of gathering life necessities creates an opportunity to indulge in these behaviors. These random appraisals are mainly applied to the same sex during various stages of life. But this edict can also be applied to cross gender comparisons. It is in these very situations where the crux of gender roles and gender stereotyping occur the most. The society’s prestige sphere is unequivocally male dominated with most opportunities and rewards being intended or even thought of as male prerequisite. This process then delegates the female contingent’s social worth to then be relegated to fulfilling mostly care positions in a private or domestic capacity. In the other extreme, social archetypes such as the hyper achieving female which can be a successful life strategy can be socially ostracized and often overwhelmed from male and sometimes female viewpoints. In this contradictory existence of social equality while contributing an equally important or in some cases more important and efficient function in society we have a basis to compare these two unlikely related culture phenomena.

The North American contemporary women as well as the contemporary Masai tribeswoman exist in very different social arenas. Their goals and customs are not alike but the conditions under which they operate are quite similar. It has developed in this paper that the indicator of customary treatment of women stems not from male financial or physical superiority viewpoints but rather the framework in which they both exist.

The Masai culture is a highly specialized entity with few choices for survival and small margins for exploitative creativity to expand interests. This survival methodology which stifles some unconventional ideas and strengthens traditional ways is not uncommon amongst pastoralist economies. The mode of survival is set and upheld to stave of deviations that can cause harm to human linearity. In this configuration there are not many methods or pathways to individuality or expressions of self solidarity for a sex that does not directly control the monetary or subsistence means in the group nor provide a security function. Women have been traditionally held in a domestic coloration. Their place is perceived to be conquering home matters and completing daily minutia in the areas of child care and food gathering. These are intended to support the male segment that provides the valued or prestige responsibilities of successful herding, warfare, raiding, making children, wiving multiple partners, etc (Burton, Kirk 1979:846-847). These tasks have socially outperformed the female responsibilities and thus are valued greater in the society. Although women do inevitably contribute greatly in their areas of influence, they also make major decisions or fiscal suggestions that are more than likely heeded by the men. But these “invisible” interactions are seldom carried out in public. Why then are the social balances skewed then in terms of public-private life? Research indicates a reasonable solution is that this behavior is a product of male competition with other males for an alpha-status in their social circles. This training of behavior to be completely autonomous and in control of all manners of existence seems to drive the public forum of the female’s second class status in these situations.

Unlike their counterpoint in East Africa, the modern woman of North America today has more social opportunity to explore their own individuality as they see fit. In their society there is no prominent need to gather, hunt, or even care for children or food sources in the same capacity as the Masai do. But beneath this outward manifestation lie the same essence of gender stratification. Women in the workforce may fully compete directly with male competitors and even hold positions overseeing and managing them. Today women who are professionals are working longer and more rigorously than ever before. They take less vacation days, work later into their pregnancies and may even be reluctant to take any form of maternity or post partum leave from work (Hynes, Singley 2005:379). These circumstances indicate that women are either biologically better suited to work or there is an underlying need to prove oneself in the workplace to defend their position from re-habitation by a male or even female competitor. The latter is where I believe the phenomenon is headed. American women’s choices are similar as other cultures only not in the same phenotypic manner. For American women the roles of social hierarchy are constantly prevalent in decisions to work later, longer, or not take holiday due to appearing not fit to execute the position currently held or one that is being vied for. These conditions are also amplified by the social implications for achieving too much in a society that so regularly praises personal achievement. In this area both men and women can be the aggressors. It is possible for women to be subject to communal backlash for not embracing the unspoken gender strata norms that conflict with the personal achievement ethos. This backlash is not physical as may be found in other societies, but more likely psychologically in nature. This is the basis of gender stratification for this example. The female members are not totally of their free will but are sometimes subjugated with mixed messages about acceptable behavior for the sex (Hynes, Singley 2005:378). In this vein direct comparisons to male competition, superiority and social position can be made as with the Masai.

Discussion

As previewed earlier in this paper the exact reasons for the adoption of this social mode of existence seem rooted in the composition of the local environment. These Environments obviously have limitations and inherent dangers imparting the necessity for humans to then assign roles and obligations based according to perceived ability and a sense of moral obligation. As in the Masai, the choice of cattle herding as a means of survival is a dangerous concept in the often sparse and dangerous savannah. The culture collectively places a high value on the control of livestock, which often results in thefts or full on raiding to gain control this finite resource. The positive adaptation of this system is the highly systematic and regimented structure under which the society exists. This deeply traditional institution has clearly defined areas of responsibility for both men and women that have served it well and have allowed these people to survive for thousands of years in such difficult terrain.

There is a similar dichotomy among the North American peoples. Although the resources needed here are not primarily grown or herded but accumulated through an advance in social status. This mode of survival has been divided by a traditional ethos of males solely providing for their families to justify their position among the male working society (Bradbury 1995:461). This is now being offset with the continued advancement of female status among the population. This new and different ideology is in conflict with the adherence to more traditional ways of greater female submissive nature. There is a shift occurring that is slowly evolving to accommodate this new social event.

Both of these cultures display the same negative parameters in regards to the conditioning methods they employ. Firstly, I believe the way in which women are ranked in the hierarchy of social order is not a maladaptive measure of itself but rather a cultural adaptation based on past experience. This is not to say that the unethical treatment of women is permissible but the manner in which they historically have survived has more to do with that cultures evolutionary modification to their respective locations. To call ones culture set maladaptive is not a methodical approach I wish to make claim to.

Secondly, the real maladaptation lies within the unwillingness to adopt a changing cultural paradigm; one that does not recognize a changing variable and exploit its new value in the emerging equation to progress that said civilization. The action to suppress this evolution of balance in the public arena may be a reaction out of fear rooted in maintaining control in society of a certain sex. Also it may be suppressed merely because of the outright competition posed by an emerging group that can change the control dynamic and alter the traditional roles already accustomed by the majority males.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the maladaptive aspects of female gender roles among a male dominated culture is largely based not within the structure of a given culture but more psychologically based toward male domination and competition for prestige, power and control of resources and property. These two cultures when studied reveal that gender stratification becomes an independent issue separate to cultural hierarchy and dependent upon outside influences to affect the mildness or severity of the stratification. In my research I have exampled both the minimum influence of strict cultural framework on stratification and revealed the root issues that inspire these behaviors to persist. In these modern times, the vast abundance of communication and ease of access to a worldwide amount of cultural and scientific data should work to aid us in placing a higher priority to the investing in and improvement of society. In this era of knowledge we can better understand ourselves and offer solutions to cultural and sex based relations.

Works Cited

1)     Bradbury, Thomas N.

1995 Assessing the Four Fundamental Domains of Marriage. Helping Contemporary Families. Family relations 44(4): 459-468.

 

2)     Burton, Michael and Lorraine Kirk

1979  Sex Differences in Maasai Cognition of Personality and Social Identity. American Anthropologist 81(4): 841-873.

3)     Hodgson, Dorothy L.

1999  Pastoralism, Patriarchy and History: Changing Gender Relations among Maasai in Tanganyika, 1890-1940. The Journal of African History 40(1): 41-65.

 

4)     Hynes, Kathryn and Singley, Susan G.

2005  Transitions to Parenthood: Work-Family Policies, Gender, and the Couple      Context. Gender and Society 19(3): 376-397.

 

5)     Kottak, Conrad Phillip

      2008  Anthropology: The Exploration of Human Diversity. New York: McGraw-Hill

 

Advertisements

Faces of Asia: A Study of Photographer Steve McCurry

 

 One elemental rule that governs every living being’s life here on this planet regardless of culture, race, beliefs, species or wealth is time. We are all bound to use whatever amount has been allotted to us while we are living. Time cannot be domesticated or controlled, the only option we have is to capture it and reflect upon what that particular moment means to us. This is the business of men like Steve McCurry. Steve McCurry has been at the “ground zero” of photojournalism for nearly thirty years. His timeless works have captured the distant lives and faces of those whom we would never normally see in our lifetimes. His subjects are foreign to our Western eyes and their customs are distant and intriguing but if you set aside these differences in appearance and custom then we can clearly see, perhaps most clearly of all, ourselves. Why do these photographs continually spellbind us so? How is it possible that simple reproduced picture can have an impact the travels far beyond the aesthetic and into the very psyche of the viewer itself? Do these personal scenes ask something from us? And if so what do they want to convey?

           “A picture says a thousand words” is a popular cliché that is used almost to the point of meaninglessness, but what if a single picture really can tell a person’s life story? What if it could speak to us? What would it tell us? In this world of “life in the fast lane” and instant gratification we go through our days without the slightest stray thought about all of the other places, cultures, struggles and triumphs that happen in the world. In its place we “multitask” and “teleconference” to comply with “deadlines” and “enterprising opportunities”.  World renown and respected photojournalist Steve McCurry captures these images with an eye for beauty and substance that has few equal. He has routinely developed some of the most haunting and introspective views into the lives of people from all over the world in various states of living; power, despair, love, death, and hope. His “eye” chronicles the lives of those whom we would never have seen or given thought to and demands we face them and in that moment share something that is so intimate and delicate, we share ourselves.  How can a mere portrait made from paper and various chemicals cause such an internal stir within us?

MOTIVATION:

          McCurry’s motivation is from the perspective of both a dedicated artist and a historian. As a historical chronicler he must assert himself into the very crux of where history is taking place. He possesses a true passion to reveal the unspoken side of historical event s and give both a face and ultimately a voice to the “unseen” participants that often get swept up into histories path. This human oriented spirit lends itself to his true expressive powers as a photographic artist. As a photographer, McCurry so wholly becomes one with his subject that he is then in a unique perspective to be surrounded by people who are unaware or detached from what he is doing and carry on their lives as normal. From this vantage he is then free to capture the images that can easily define a region or at the very least bring attention a situation far better than any figurehead or mass communication could vocalize.

Audience:

          I believe these images of simple and oft time’s impoverished people are meant for the ones who are merely unaware of their existence. For me, I felt that his work reaches its maximum potential with those of us who have more benefits and luxuries in life than the persons pictured. I think his work is meant for core nations in the western world primarily. These personal and engaging portraits would likely have little effect if they were shown to someone who is, for instance, the neighbor of one of the subjects. His work does far more to those who upon viewing them can take a long and calculated look into the alternative versions of human life that are not so easily seen from the vantage of an office desk or from a computer screen and then be stripped of their comfort and have to be face to face with someone in such a personal way. This proves to have a cathartic effect on the viewer in that throughout their plight or struggle or poverty they still have the same basic needs and desires as anyone else. In this way McCurry lets us all know that there is a big world out there and we are only after all a small portion of it.

Journalism or art?:

         Marshall McLuhan once said that the “medium is the message” and in that context I do not believe there is a decisive difference between both journalism and art because they neither can exist without a usage of the other. Art is a form of journalism in that it reports a thought or sentiment that is captured in the mind of the creator andrendered onto the chosen medium. Art more than anything else can exponentially magnify the emotional meaning and intent of any piece because of arts nature to “speak” to a portion of our mind that is not overtly accessed by the hearing or reading of words. It can play on our fears, fill us with joy and love or leave us moved and saddened. These intrinsic qualities are what make it so valuable to this end.  Solely reporting without the usage of some kind of iconography or thematic visual aid could not deliver the same message with all the intent that the writer, or editor would have devised. This is not to say that writing by itself cannot create a similar situation in one’s mind through the use of creative and strategic word choice. but as a visual creatures something very personal happens when we are shown a glimpse into art.

Framing and Conclusion:

  They framing of the artists work is the crucial component that makes it as extraordinary and powerful as it is even fifteen or twenty years later. McCurry’s technique gives the viewer enough surrounding information to provide the basics of a back story for the subject but not enough to really know definitively. This is accomplished by the proximity of the subject in the portrait. He puts us (the viewer) closer and more intimate than we would likely be with almost anyone except our family and loved ones. He somehow pireces our comfort zone and leaves us no choice but to partake in the exchange. We cannot be protected by our status, or prestige and we must meet and engage this person on equal terms. The realization that this is a real human being that did not rehearse this picture or do anything other than be at this place at such a specific point in time somehow burnishes a feeling of concern or worry that they are safe and not in need almost the same way you would care for a family member. His pictures take away the defensive walls that humans build and let us see each other in the “unguarded moment” as Mr. McCurry says where very real feelings of compassion and kinship spawn for each other on a species level. After viewing this exhibit my idea about his work has changed tremendously and I am deeply satisfied that I have had the chance to view this exhibit and formulate these conclusions.

Has the dream been realized?: a reflection on the civil rights movement in the clime of the Jena 6 and the election of our 44th president.

   

Dr. Martin Luther King in Washington D.C.

 

 On August 28, 1963 beneath a sweltering Washington D.C. sun resumed a journey for redemption that had begun nearly four hundred years earlier across the mighty Atlantic Ocean. As a people who, stripped of their pride and dignity were utilized as an expendable resource in a foreign land to carry out the tasks that seemed to be beneath the doing of white hands. These “tasks” that those slaves were burdened where the toils of enduring harshness that have built the very bedrock of our land. And from that land over three hundred thousand men and women of all colors and religious denominations have congregated at our nation’s capitol to embody a growing outrage that was not being given proper remedy.  Those that gathered where; of assorted and varying race, unified with one another, and peaceful but thunderously demanding that an end be brought to the injustices that had been delivered to them through the cold motions of indolence and dispassionate action from their government.  Here in front of the Lincoln Memorial, Dr. Martin Luther King would have seen the masses that collectively gathered and displayed no sense of individuality or apparent distinction from one person to the next. Here, all is how he must have envisioned in his dream. And from this place of turbulence and roiling unrest articulated and with all the soothing nature his clerical background could muster he imparted an ever hopeful plea into what was to become a lighthouse beacon shining through the darkest of nights. A plea that Illuminated even the most bewildered and lost souls to usher in a new chapter of peace and brotherhood for every person who would call themselves American.  

            Although, in light of the many advances and tolerances we now enjoy in today’s society there is a small, creeping notion to uphold the walls of indifference that were built up so long ago. Though the fires of racial injustice have been all but extinguished, beneath those very ashes smolder the embers of dissension and mistrust.  We  are now faced with not reigning in the fiery content of a person’s speech or ending the malicious content of their actions, but to try to open the most important of all conduits; our minds. We have now in recent times seen such blaring examples of the old world that still fester within the very halls of justice.  Actions that sharply contrast our popular ideal of what equality and progress have come to mean. Travesties such as the “Jena 6” in which there is an obvious bias in how ” law” is metered  out to even our own children.  And unbelievably, no clear resolution was made to correct these missteps until the verge of a civil thunderstorm was brought to bear on the small town of Jena. This abhorrence of  justice was a flashpoint to causing  old familiar labels to be made again and giving those who had not yet been burned by hatred a chance to stir those ashes and unearth that underlying intolerance renewed.  

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               And still, after almost forty six years, those prophetic words of peace and harmony that Dr. King spoke to us  have struggled at times but certainly have endured. We are no longer a country  openly divided which can sanction arbitrary laws that limit the expansion of a person’s intellect or bar an individual  from using the common facilities that are public and located at reasonable distances or means. We have learned to co-exist and become the richer for it. The examples of our cultures merging is apparent and all around. From seeing couples of mixed racial background freely enjoying each other’s company to school children sharing their lunches at recess. The time for wholesale bigotry has been brought to a much needed and abrupt end.  We have, in less than fifty years, done much to level the partitions that stand between unity and the union of improving our lives together. We are making strides to uplift the status of the most exalted of all religious teachings, fellowship. We have proudly claimed a victory to that end with the overwhelming election of our forty-fourth president. These are extraordinary times that would surely have made Dr. Martin Luther King very deeply satisfied with the evolution of his aspirations. Time is the healer of all wounds but the ointment which promotes a strong and healthy recovery is the faith of the people who carry their vision high and share it for all to see.  

            But still in this pursuit of companionship there have also been many casualties along the way. Good men and women who have at their end compiled a portfolio of understanding and compassion for even the ones who have dealt them their final blow. We have lost irreplaceable minds in senseless acts. These losses have incited everyone at one time or another to question whether or not the cause is lost. We are reminded of the sting that accompanies the departing of heroic icons that brave the unrelenting odds and the void in which they leave in their wake. To have shone so brightly and burned out so young is a painful transition for all to comprehend. But within that grief there lays a strong testament to the validity and urgency of the ever widening chasm they had given their lives to span. For across that great divide lies the sweet tranquility of the Promised Land. And in that sense their struggle seems duly justified.